The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) was a significant piece of legislation that governed foreign exchange transactions and foreign investment in India for several decades.
Verified Lawyers
Consultation starting from ₹ 10999
FERA Law in India The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) was a significant piece of legislation that governed foreign exchange transactions and foreign investment in India for several decades. However, it was repealed and replaced by the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) in 1999. In this blog post, we will delve into the history of FERA, its provisions, and its eventual transformation into FEMA, shedding light on the implications and relevance of these laws in India today. The Birth of FERA FERA was enacted in 1973 with the primary objective of regulating foreign exchange transactions and the inflow of foreign capital into India. At the time of its inception, India was grappling with a balance of payments crisis, and the government sought stringent measures to control foreign exchange reserves. Key Provisions of FERA 1. Control over Foreign Exchange: FERA granted the government broad powers to control and regulate foreign exchange transactions. All transactions involving foreign exchange had to be conducted through authorized dealers, and any violation of these rules could result in severe penalties. 2. Residential Status: FERA categorized individuals as residents and non-residents based on their duration of stay in India. Residents were subject to stricter regulations regarding foreign exchange transactions. 3. Prohibition on Holding Foreign Assets: FERA restricted Indian residents from owning, holding, or transferring foreign assets without prior approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). 4. Penalties and Enforcement: FERA imposed stringent penalties for violations, including fines and imprisonment. Enforcement authorities had wide-ranging powers to investigate and prosecute offenders. 5. Authorized Dealers: The Act introduced the concept of authorized dealers, usually banks, through which foreign exchange transactions had to be routed. These dealers acted as intermediaries between individuals or businesses and the RBI. Challenges and Criticisms of FERA FERA faced criticism for its overly strict and draconian provisions. Many argued that it discouraged foreign investment and stifled economic growth by creating a hostile environment for international businesses. The Act extensive regulatory framework also led to a thriving black market for foreign exchange, as individuals and businesses sought to circumvent its provisions. The Transition to FEMA Recognizing the need for a more liberalized approach to foreign exchange and foreign investment, the Indian government repealed FERA in 1999 and replaced it with the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). FEMA sought to promote a more conducive environment for foreign investments and transactions while maintaining the government regulatory control over the foreign exchange market. Key Differences Between FERA and FEMA 1. Liberalization: FEMA introduced a more liberalized framework for foreign exchange transactions and foreign investments. It allowed for greater ease of doing business and reduced regulatory hurdles. 2. Definition of Resident: FEMA simplified the definition of resident and non-resident, making it more aligned with modern economic realities. 3. Penalties: While FEMA retained penalties for violations, they were generally less severe compared to FERA. 4. Authorized Persons: FEMA introduced the concept of authorized persons who were empowered to deal in foreign exchange transactions, expanding the scope beyond banks. FERA and FEMA Today FERA repeal and the introduction of FEMA marked a turning point in India economic policy. The liberalized framework of FEMA has contributed to the country economic growth by attracting foreign investment and simplifying foreign exchange transactions. It has also facilitated India integration into the global economy. However, it is essential to note that even though FERA is no longer in force, some of its provisions continue to influence FEMA regulations and the overall regulatory landscape in India. The government maintains regulatory oversight to prevent misuse or illegal activities. Conclusion FERA, although considered stringent and outdated, played a significant role in India economic history. Its replacement with FEMA marked a shift toward a more open and investor-friendly environment while still safeguarding the country economic interests. Understanding the evolution from FERA to FEMA provides valuable insights into India economic policies and the government efforts to strike a balance between regulation and economic growth in a globalized world.
.png)
Pay securely with major Credit and Debit cards, online Wallets and UPI
Consult on WhatsApp
